Universities should not be extensions of TVET education

June 12th 2024.

The Madani government recently launched the National Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Policy 2030. The objective is to “reshape” the TVET landscape, especially in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI), electric vehicles (EV), electronic technology (with a concentration on integrated circuits, engineering design and water fabrication), cyber security, farm mechanisation, automation of agriculture and livestock, and advanced materials.

GERAK applauds the allocation of an additional RM200m, for the purpose of modernising and upskilling graduates. However, GERAK respectfully disagrees with the government’s unconditional suggestion to expand the TVET sector in the learning sector, “up to higher education institutions”.

Assuming these institutions include Malaysia’s universities, it calls into question the government’s understanding of the purpose of a university education.

Universities are institutions of knowledge production and acquisition. They offer students a combination of theoretical knowledge, critical thinking skills, and some practical training in the form of field research and short-term industrial and corporate internships. Students may gain industry-based exposure via internships, but these must be treated as a small but important segment of the larger university educational experience.

The primary focus must be on research, the dissemination of competing ideas, and pedagogy. Furthermore, teaching must remain an equal partner in this tri-partite focus of all universities in Malaysia. As such, GERAK strongly believes that the roles that universities play in society must complement TVET learning. They must not be extensions of TVET education.

Furthermore, policies such as TVET 2030 must not be conflated with policies to improve higher education in general. Similarly, the call for universities to “align” themselves with the needs of industry is a constrictive and narrow view of Malaysia’s higher educational objectives.

Universities must not be devoted solely to the business of preparing graduates for the job market. Instead, TVET is meant to train students in job-specific skills. Therefore, the two must be conceptualised separately, but at the same time complement each other in the final outcome. Simply put, both institutional genres are needed for the country’s healthy economic, social and cultural development.

Furthermore, GERAK opines that amidst all these competing narratives, a “collection of glaring and decades-long problems” in Malaysia’s educational landscape is being neglected. The crumbling quality of our kindergarten, primary and secondary schools need attention. The launching of TVET 2030 triggers the more critical question of what landscape needs “reshaping”, “uplifting”, “modernising” and “upskilling”.

GERAK suggests that in the context of Malaysia’s current educational landscape, the following issues must be considered if TVET and university reforms will succeed in the near future:

  1. At the kindergarten, primary and secondary school levels, children must be exposed to cross-cultural histories and religions, and diverse philosophical approaches to life.
  2. Teach them from young, how to question, think, and debate. This way, our school-going youth will be better informed of the inter-civilisational nature of our region, i.e. the Nusantara, and be more accepting of the diversity of our own society.
  3. Teach them the basic social sciences, liberal arts and humanities subjects.
  4. Prepare our primary school students how to live in a multicultural society, meaning, do not segregate classes. For example, have religious classes after the core school curriculum is completed during school hours.
  5. Focus a lot more on civic education, build patriotism among the young, and expose our children to basic information on party politics, parliament, and different forms of governance.
  6. It would help too to have a stand-alone combined module on the Federal Constitution and the Rukun Negara. Both should be taught together. The Rukun Negara must be taught in its entirety, including the Preamble and Commentary.
  7. Expose all students to dual languages, i.e. Bahasa Melayu and English. Vernacular and indigenous languages are equally important because these define the Malaysian identity. So, many will have to be at least tri-lingual. Malaysia is not the only country having to grapple with this, and many nations have succeeded.

To enable all the above, we must re-educate teachers. If possible, in the future the government could impose a condition that all future teachers obtain a Master’s degree to qualify as a teacher in the school system. This has been done in countries like Finland, and would partly uplift the perception of the teaching profession.

It is also vital to increase the salaries of teachers, while unburdening them from the monotonous administrative work that bogs them down on a daily basis. Lastly, if classrooms are upgraded, and more schools built, the sizes of classes can be potentially reduced to allow for more value-added pedagogy.  

Malaysia needs a combination of political will, a revolution in our school curriculum, and an overhaul of our educational ethos if TVET and higher education, in general, will be successful and sustainable. GERAK hopes that Anwar Ibrahim and the Madani government will seriously consider these points.

This statement has also been published in Free Malaysia Today, The Malaysian Insight

Scroll to Top